Southern Arizona: Lives that Shaped the Frontier Experience :: Essays Papers

Ordinary Women in Early Twentieth Century Southern Arizona Lives that regulate the Frontier Experience Some historians have argued that womens roles in early 20th century Arizona centered exclusively around the domestic bailiwick and typified values of femininity such as passivity, motherhood, and loyalty to marriage. Their journeys to the watt are likewise portrayed as involuntary and life on the frontier a hated struggle. For example, Christiane Fischer states, Frontier conditions tended to reinforce women in their traditional roles and did not open up any new possibilities for them (Fischer, 46). Although this may have been true for some, womens boilers suit experiences and contributions to Arizonas history were much more complex. Although historically important figures are often over-represented in the stories we tell about our past, it is essential to remember that loving change cannot occur without the involvement of thousands of ordinary folks. According to E.D . Branch, If there is a moral to the history of the westward movement, it is this the transcendent importance of small things and of unimportant volume (Branch in Poling-Kempes, xii). This is especially relevant to womens history in that womens experiences are often ignored in dominant discourse and their achievements are relegated to the concealed sphere of domesticity. This essay will explore the ways in which ordinary women influenced the development of the Arizona frontier and to what extent the conditions of this lifestyle affected their roles and opportunities. At the vacate of the century, women in the West enjoyed greater freedom than their sisters in other parts of the country. Various social and economic necessities both allowed and forced women into situations that were traditionally reserved for men. Lesley Poling-Kempes states, hammock may have been a side effect, rather than a motivating force or premeditated goal, for women in the new society of the Americ an West (Poling-Kempes, 49). Women in this region generally had a better economic status, more job opportunities, and higher legal status than women in other regions (Rothschild and Hronek, xx). Historians have presented some(prenominal) hypotheses to explain this geographical distinction. One such theory is that the biased sex ratio (many more men were present than women) required men to be broad of women leading unconventional lifestyles. Another possibility is that, overall, the frontier embraced a more democratic way of life than settled areas, which in turn affected womens rights (Rothschild and Hronek, xx).